assets/videos/teaser.mp4
Abstract
Contributions
Method
PhysPlan operates in two stages: an agentic planner reasons about physical causality and emits a Chain-of-Visual-Thought, then a training-free guidance stage renders it into video while routing optimization to active objects.
assets/pipeline.png
Drop your final Stage 1 / Stage 2 overview (the clearer supplementary version is recommended)
Agentic Physical Planning
A vision-language model acts as a cognitive simulator: it parses the scene into a graph, predicts a causal sequence of physical state transitions, renders intermediate keyframes, and extracts kinematic masks, depth, and a kinetic-intensity profile.
Training-Free Graph-Guided Optimization
The extracted conditions steer the reverse diffusion process via masked spatial-trajectory and 3D structural-consistency losses, with Object-Centric Gradient Routing and a kinetics-aware schedule — no fine-tuning of the base model.
Chain-of-Visual-Thought
The planner decomposes a prompt into a sequence of grounded visual states. Select a step:
Key mechanisms
Object-Centric Gradient Routing
The test-time gradient is routed exclusively through the active-object region defined by the downsampled mask, so the passive background receives no update and is preserved exactly.
Kinetic Intensity Profiling
The planner scores per-frame physical volatility. The guidance learning rate and step density scale with it, concentrating optimization on high-entropy events such as collisions and phase changes.
Experiments
Qualitative comparisons
Same prompt and initial frame, every method, one shared timeline. Select a scenario:
Physical plausibility (PhyGenBench)
Physical plausibility (Physics-IQ)
Generalization across vision-language models
Video quality (VBench)
Ablation study
User study
Failure analysis & limitations
Representative failure cases
assets/failure.png
Supplementary limitations figure: mask leakage · extreme fragmentation